How mars can teach us about our own finance universe
When it comes to personal finance, we’re usually advised to keep a little distance, figuratively, from our financial assets. This time let’s get an overview – literally. We can learn a lot from NASA and the setbacks it faces as it tries to bring its Martian samples back to Earth. It’s a perfect example of the kind of planning fallacy that can affect our reasoning on the timelines, costs, risks, and benefits of our financial decisions.
Investment advisor at Societe Generale Private Banking.
Are we really smarter than a rocket scientist?
A few short weeks ago, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announced it would1 “seek innovative designs that will lower cost [and] risk” to transport the rocks sampled from Mars back to Earth. This came after an independent audit found that NASA had “[u]nrealistic budget and schedule expectations from the beginning”. This amounts to a doubling of costs, which are expected to ultimately reach $11 billion, and an arrival date closer to 2040 than 2030! Variances of over $5 billion, and an extra ten years, amount to quite a dilemma!
And yet, in our regular forecasts, can we really be more accurate than these world-class engineers working for a rigorous scientific organisation? The answer lies in our own behaviour. Are we last-minute Christmas shoppers? Do we leave paperwork until it’s down to the wire? Do our home improvement projects drag on and on? Maybe we underestimate holiday budgets or drive times, let alone the spiralling costs and delays in building or IT projects or business ventures.
NASA’s troubles may be in today’s headlines, but this kind of planning fallacy was spotlighted as far back as 1977, by researchers Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman2. They found that people looking to forecast deadlines tend to go with their gut – but that our intuition is often wrong. By systematically repeating those errors, they concluded that cognitive bias existed, but did not solidify their findings with experiments. Those were conducted later, as in 19943 when psychology students had to estimate the time needed to finish their thesis. While the majority of students took 55.5 days (with just 30% meeting the anticipated deadline), they had predicted, on average, 33.9 days, 27.4 days “if everything went as well as it possibly could” and 48.6 days “if everything went as poorly as it possibly could”.
The initial definition of the planning fallacy was expanded in 2003 (by Daniel Kahneman and Dan Lovallo4) to include underestimating the costs and risks of decisions and overestimating their benefits. Those errors are based on different mechanisms like optimism bias, overconfidence and forgetting previous experience.
From Martian rocks to the cornerstones of our decisions
Since anticipation is a cornerstone of our personal finances, they can be severely impacted by planning fallacy. For example, the consequences can show up when setting up or selling a business, running a construction project, relocating internationally, or comprehensively restructuring your financial assets.
The planning fallacy can cause unexpected delays that may jeopardise some key deadlines (e.g. fiscal year end, capital gain or loss offsets, etc.), the speed of ROI, or even the success of the financial transaction. Likewise, this bias can cause budget overruns, leading us to question the financial rationale of an operation or investment.
The planning fallacy, then, affects both i) the yield component of a project, by undervaluing the investment required and overestimating the profits and execution speed, and ii) the risk component by undervaluing it.
You can set up a few safeguards to shield you from this bias:
Be sure to view things from a distance: the planning fallacy can also cause us to overestimate the time and budget a third party will spend on their tasks. Of course, this is an effective way to balance out our overconfidence in ourselves!
If you have a decision approaching, break it down into several tasks to help you accurately calculate implementation costs and timelines.
Include your worst-case scenario: in the study mentioned above, the timeline in the worst of cases still didn’t go far enough!
For anyone who might have misjudged the time that went into writing this, the content is reassuring – a NASA engineer couldn’t have come closer!
1 https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-sets-path-to-return-mars-samples-seeks-innovative-designs/
2 “Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures”; Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman; 1977
3 “Exploring the ‘planning fallacy’: Why people underestimate their task completion times”; Buehler, R., D. Griffin and M. Ross; 1994.
4 “Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives’ Decisions (hbr.org)”; Kahneman, D. and D. Lovallo; 2003
FIND OUR OTHER ARTICLES:
GENERAL DISCLAIMER:
Societe Generale Private Banking is Societe Generale Group’s business operating through its head office at Societe Generale SA, as well as departments, branches and subsidiaries located in the areas referred to below, under the Societe Generale Private Banking brand, and is the distributor of this document.
This is an advertising document and holds no contractual value. It is not intended to provide an investment service. In addition, it does not constitute investment advice or a personalised recommendation on a financial product, or advice or a personalised recommendation on insurance, or any form of canvassing, or legal, tax or accounting advice from any Societe Generale Private Banking entity whatsoever.
The information contained in this document may be amended without prior notice, and is for illustrative purposes only to provide the reader with information that may be of use in making decisions. Any information on past performance, even repeated performance, does not under any circumstances guarantee future performance.
The private bankers of the Societe Generale Private Banking entities can provide potential investors with more detailed information on the offerings, within their Societe Generale Private Banking entity, in the theme presented in this document.
This document is confidential and intended solely for the recipient. It may not be made public or disclosed to any third party, nor reproduced in whole or in part without the prior and written agreement of the Societe Generale Private Banking entity concerned.
Under no circumstances shall any Societe Generale Private Banking entity be held liable for any decision made by an investor on the basis of this information alone.
Societe Generale Group maintains an operational administrative organisation taking all necessary measures to identify, verify and manage conflicts of interest. To that end, the entities of Societe Generale Private Banking have established a conflicts of interest management policy aimed at managing and preventing conflicts of interest. For more details, clients of Societe Generale Private Banking may refer to the conflicts of interest management policy available on request from their private banker.
Societe Generale Private Banking have also established a policy to address any complaints filed by its clients. Clients may request this policy from their private banker or on the institutional website of Societe Generale Private Banking (www.privatebanking.societegenerale.com).
DISCLAIMERS BY JURISDICTION
France: Unless indicated otherwise, this document is published and distributed by Societe Generale, a French bank authorised and supervised by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (French Prudential Supervisory and Resolution Authority), located at 4 place de Budapest, CS 92459, 75436 Paris Cedex 09, under the prudential supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB) and registered with ORIAS as an insurance broker under number 07 022 493, orias.fr. Societe Generale is a public limited company (société anonyme) under French law, with capital stock of €1, 003, 724, 927.50 as of 17 November 2023 with its registered office at 29 boulevard Haussmann, 75009 Paris, France, and registered with the Paris Trade and Companies Register (Paris R.C.S) under the unique identification number 552 120 222. Paris. More details are available on request or online at www.privatebanking.societegenerale.com/.
Decryption of the projection bias
Insights by our Wealth Engineering expert, Stéphane Maljevac.
Hospitality is a vibrant sector that’s always on the move and influenced by a multitude of economic, social and...